
Christian author, broadcaster and vicar’s wife Anne Atkins has left London for Oxford, where her husband Shaun has been appointed as director of Christian education at St Andrew’s church, Linton Road.
You
probably think you know all there is to know about Anne Atkins and her
views. You may have heard her often controversial but always thought
provoking Thought for the Day pieces on Radio 4’s Today programme, or
read her columns in the Daily Telegraph or the Daily Express or are a
fan of her books. Wherever you turn in the media, it seems Anne is
there these days, espousing her no-nonsense approach to faith and
family life.
But despite the media’s attempts to pigeonhole her as a ‘family values
campaigner’ she is full of surprises. Her latest book, Child Rearing
for Fun, is a case in point. You might (and I certainly did) have
expected Anne the vicar’s wife and staunch supporter of the family to
be against working mothers. Not a bit of it. The book celebrates
working mothers and places its emphasis on enjoying the time you spend
with your children, not worrying about ‘quality time’ or ‘quantity
time’.
She has always worked, despite having five children (the youngest is
just 22 months) and her decision to do so is rooted firmly in her faith.
‘Its clear from Genesis 1 and Proverbs 31 that both men and women are
created to work and Paul specifically says women who do not provide for
their family are worse than unbelievers. I am created to work, I always
had an urge to work.
‘I’m not saying full time parents aren’t working, of course they are,
but for me it was also a financial necessity, as it is for all clergy
families these days.’
She was also a strong supporter of women’s ordinations, though she believes that synod should not have agreed to it when it did.
‘I was passionately in favour of women’s ordination, I wanted to see it
very much but I couldn’t have voted for it because it flies in the face
of what Paul says about unity and sensitivity to other’s consciences.
If two thirds of synod forced one third of synod to do what they
believed to be wrong, then it doesn’t seem consistent with Christian
teaching. I didn’t personally think it was wrong or unbiblical but I
don’t believe we should have forced this view on others.’
Anne studied at Oxford, where she met her future husband, Shaun. She
went on to train as an actress and played alongside other future film
and TV stars such as Rowan Atkinson and Richard Curtis.
It was when she had her first child she turned to writing though, as
she says, it took her three children to finish the book, which is a
study of the roles of men and women from a Biblical point of view.
This led in turn to the beginning of her broadcasting career.
‘I first started doing broadcasting through publicity for the book I
was doing. I had been asked some years before to do a Thought for the
Day, but I thought then it was a bit wishy-washy so I wasn’t terribly
interested. But then five or six years later, David Winter suggested me
again. We’d met doing something else together. So I first went on in
1996 and my first Thought for the Day was about legalising
prostitution. I had asked before what I was allowed to say and what I
wasn’t, and was I told I could say what I liked and I thought, great,
I’ll go for it.’
But it was when she spoke out on Thought for the Day against a service
at Southwark Cathedral celebrating the Lesbian and Gay Christian
movement that media interest in Anne really took off.
Journalistic interest was in part provoked by the fact that Church
House Westminster phoned the BBC to complain about her piece, the first
time it had complained about a Thought for the Day item. But from then
on, Anne hasn’t been out of work as a writer and broadcaster.
She says that she hopes her move to Oxford will allow her to do more
writing and less TV and radio work. But the day I arrive at her home
for the interview she’s been up since 4.30am to do a piece for GMTV and
is preparing to follow that up with a live appearance on the BBC’s
Heaven and Earth Show.
Her broadcasting career is founded on her very decided opinions. I ask her whether she ever has doubts.
‘I have lots of doubts over little things, I find it really hard
to make up my mind over a menu for example. But I didn’t have any
difficulty when Shaun proposed either and that was a big thing,
obviously!’
She was brought up in a very ‘Anglican’ family and says while she never
doubted the truth of Christianity she did doubt, in her teens and
twenties, ‘whether I was a Christian’.
‘The question of who Jesus was and what he claimed to be was more obvious, I have never doubted that,’ she says.
Her new book on enjoying parenting ends with a section on children’s
spiritual health. Her children’s faith is, of course, tremendously
important to her. I ask if she will feel she has failed as a mother if
any of her children reject their faith.
She says: ‘I’d be absolutely devastated, it would be more a bereavement
than a failure. I would think that I would not see them on Judgement
Day. It would be terrible.’
One of her daughter’s has been ill with obsessive compulsive disorder
and this illness has challenged her daughter’s faith, she admits. But
Anne says she had no doubts about how her daughter should be treated,
and her book is written to encourage other parents to ‘go with their
instincts’, enjoy their children, and, if necessary, disregard the
experts.
The book is infused with a general distrust of experts, in part because
of a couple of bad experiences which are detailed, but also because
Anne firmly believes that parents know best.
I ask if she has ever questioned her own parenting skills. ‘With
children the bad decisions you make aren’t obvious for several years.
When my daughter was really ill, it was obvious we knew what to do.’
She has spoken before about her disenchantment with the state of the
Church of England, its financial problems, its divisions over
homosexuality and women bishops.
Would anything make her leave the Church of England? The answer is thoroughly Anne. ‘Certainly not. If bishop or whoever goes off the rails it does not mean the rest of us Anglicans have to shift our position,’ she says firmly.

There she was, standing up for orthodoxy and all they could do was complain. Shows how liberal the establishment has become.
Will be interesting to see if Church House Westminster complains about Giles Fraser's Thought for the Day today, pro Gay Marriage. Somehow I think not............
Social workers and "Ministers" say they cannot comment on individual cases;so here are four "general questions” that they can and should answer.
1:-Why are parents who lose their children in the family Courts legally gagged to stop them protesting?
2:-Why can family courts send around 200 parents a year to prison secretly with no public hearing?(Harriet Harman's answer to a parliamentary question)
3:-Why are hundreds of children and newborn babies unnecessarily taken every year for "forced adoption" because social workers and their hired “experts” predict (using a crystal ball?) they might be at "risk"of neglect or that old "SS standby" emotional abuse?
4:-Why can hardened criminals avoid "establishment judges" by demanding trial by jury,when parents risking losing their children for life are denied this option?
IAN JOSEPHS
5 BROMPTON PLACE
SW3 1QE
TEL 0033626875684
This simple solution to the problem of public safety would ensure that there would then be plenty of room in our prisons for violent offenders to be given much much longer sentences. This so obvious measure would at least keep violent criminals off the streets and stop them immediately reoffending following early release !
That's why Anne Atkins is infuriating. She has a public platform, but no depth of investigation or consideration. Just glib opinions, based on bigotry.
I do understand the desire of Christians to assert that all beliefs should be respected. When the beliefs are founded on miscomprehension and ignorance, it makes them very difficult to respect. Why should one offer respect to beliefs, when the basis for forming them is misinterpretation of physical evidence?
So, no, I won't be reading Anne's opinion. I don't believe what she has to say. I'm only here because she has so consistently misunderstood and misrepresented on Thought For The Day, with no right to reply.
Has she heard about the sexual orientation regulations that they are trying to bring out next year? If she is interested there is a very good website by the Christian Congress for Traditional Values (www.thecctv.org).
Leave your comments on this item
More website comments