The Diocese of Oxford Official Home Page
Home
Site Map
Search
the Door
God in the life of...
Bible Study
Competitions
Eco Column
Editorials
Letters to the Editor
My Story
Not So Long Ago
Press Review
Recipes
Reviews
Thought for the Month
View from here
World Church
God in the life of...

Fun, faith and family with Anne Atkins

Date Added: Thursday 24th March 2005

Christian author, broadcaster and vicar’s wife Anne Atkins has left London for Oxford, where her husband Shaun has been appointed as director of Christian education at St Andrew’s church, Linton Road.

You probably think you know all there is to know about Anne Atkins and her views. You may have heard her often controversial but always thought provoking Thought for the Day pieces on Radio 4’s Today programme, or read her columns in the Daily Telegraph or the Daily Express or are a fan of her books. Wherever you turn in the media, it seems Anne is there these days, espousing her no-nonsense approach to faith and family life.

But despite the media’s attempts to pigeonhole her as a ‘family values campaigner’ she is full of surprises. Her latest book, Child Rearing for Fun, is a case in point. You might (and I certainly did) have expected Anne the vicar’s wife and staunch supporter of the family to be against working mothers. Not a bit of it. The book celebrates working mothers and places its emphasis on enjoying the time you spend with your children, not worrying about ‘quality time’ or ‘quantity time’.

She has always worked, despite having five children (the youngest is just 22 months) and her decision to do so is rooted firmly in her faith.

‘Its clear from Genesis 1 and Proverbs 31 that both men and women are created to work and Paul specifically says women who do not provide for their family are worse than unbelievers. I am created to work, I always had an urge to work.

‘I’m not saying full time parents aren’t working, of course they are, but for me it was also a financial necessity, as it is for all clergy families these days.’

She was also a strong supporter of women’s ordinations, though she believes that synod should not have agreed to it when it did.

‘I was passionately in favour of women’s ordination, I wanted to see it very much but I couldn’t have voted for it because it flies in the face of what Paul says about unity and sensitivity to other’s consciences. If two thirds of synod forced one third of synod to do what they believed to be wrong, then it doesn’t seem consistent with Christian teaching. I didn’t personally think it was wrong or unbiblical but I don’t believe we should have forced this view on others.’

Anne studied at Oxford, where she met her future husband, Shaun. She went on to train as an actress and played alongside other future film and TV stars such as Rowan Atkinson and Richard Curtis.

It was when she had her first child she turned to writing though, as she says, it took her three children to finish the book, which is a study of the roles of men and women from a Biblical point of view.

This led in turn to the beginning of her broadcasting career.

‘I first started doing broadcasting through publicity for the book I was doing. I had been asked some years before to do a Thought for the Day, but I thought then it was a bit wishy-washy so I wasn’t terribly interested. But then five or six years later, David Winter suggested me again. We’d met doing something else together. So I first went on in 1996 and my first Thought for the Day was about legalising prostitution. I had asked before what I was allowed to say and what I wasn’t, and was I told I could say what I liked and I thought, great, I’ll go for it.’

But it was when she spoke out on Thought for the Day against a service at Southwark Cathedral celebrating the Lesbian and Gay Christian movement that media interest in Anne really took off.

Journalistic interest was in part provoked by the fact that Church House Westminster phoned the BBC to complain about her piece, the first time it had complained about a Thought for the Day item. But from then on, Anne hasn’t been out of work as a writer and broadcaster.

She says that she hopes her move to Oxford will allow her to do more writing and less TV and radio work. But the day I arrive at her home for the interview she’s been up since 4.30am to do a piece for GMTV and is preparing to follow that up with a live appearance on the BBC’s Heaven and Earth Show.

Her broadcasting career is founded on her very decided opinions. I ask her whether she ever has doubts.

 ‘I have lots of doubts over little things, I find it really hard to make up my mind over a menu for example. But I didn’t have any difficulty when Shaun proposed either and that was a big thing, obviously!’

She was brought up in a very ‘Anglican’ family and says while she never doubted the truth of Christianity she did doubt, in her teens and twenties, ‘whether I was a Christian’.

‘The question of who Jesus was and what he claimed to be was more obvious, I have never doubted that,’ she says.

Her new book on enjoying parenting ends with a section on children’s spiritual health. Her children’s faith is, of course, tremendously important to her. I ask if she will feel she has failed as a mother if any of her children reject their faith.

She says: ‘I’d be absolutely devastated, it would be more a bereavement than a failure. I would think that I would not see them on Judgement Day. It would be terrible.’

One of her daughter’s has been ill with obsessive compulsive disorder and this illness has challenged her daughter’s faith, she admits. But Anne says she had no doubts about how her daughter should be treated, and her book is written to encourage other parents to ‘go with their instincts’, enjoy their children, and, if necessary, disregard the experts.

The book is infused with a general distrust of experts, in part because of a couple of bad experiences which are detailed, but also because Anne firmly believes that parents know best.

I ask if she has ever questioned her own parenting skills. ‘With children the bad decisions you make aren’t obvious for several years. When my daughter was really ill, it was obvious we knew what to do.’

She has spoken before about her disenchantment with the state of the Church of England, its financial problems, its divisions over homosexuality and women bishops. 

Would anything make her leave the Church of England? The answer is thoroughly Anne. ‘Certainly not. If bishop or whoever goes off the rails it does not mean the rest of us Anglicans have to shift our position,’ she says firmly.

Useful Links
Thought for the Day: Anne Atkins
Child rearing for fun
St Andrew's Church

Comments
Ironic that Church House Westminster complained about Anne's Thought for the Day on the LGM service at Southwark Cathedral.
There she was, standing up for orthodoxy and all they could do was complain. Shows how liberal the establishment has become.
Will be interesting to see if Church House Westminster complains about Giles Fraser's Thought for the Day today, pro Gay Marriage. Somehow I think not............
James (Rev)
18th June 2008
Anne, do you feel any compassion for mothers who are the victims of "forced adoption" is their children are adopted by strangers against the will of the parents?Secret family courts take babies at birth for "risk of emotional abuse" from mothers with no criminal records no problems with drugs or alcohol,and no mental issues.
Social workers and "Ministers" say they cannot comment on individual cases;so here are four "general questions” that they can and should answer.

1:-Why are parents who lose their children in the family Courts legally gagged to stop them protesting?

2:-Why can family courts send around 200 parents a year to prison secretly with no public hearing?(Harriet Harman's answer to a parliamentary question)

3:-Why are hundreds of children and newborn babies unnecessarily taken every year for "forced adoption" because social workers and their hired “experts” predict (using a crystal ball?) they might be at "risk"of neglect or that old "SS standby" emotional abuse?

4:-Why can hardened criminals avoid "establishment judges" by demanding trial by jury,when parents risking losing their children for life are denied this option?

IAN JOSEPHS

5 BROMPTON PLACE

SW3 1QE

TEL 0033626875684
ian josephs
12th April 2008
You were so right on "the big questions" this morning when you said it was stupid to send non violent criminals to prison.Most of us are much more worried by violent criminals than other offenders who could be given community service and/or strictly monitored electronic tagging.
This simple solution to the problem of public safety would ensure that there would then be plenty of room in our prisons for violent offenders to be given much much longer sentences. This so obvious measure would at least keep violent criminals off the streets and stop them immediately reoffending following early release !
ian josephs
16th March 2008
I have always found Anne to be dogmatic and extremely unforgiving in her views. Unfortunately she is not someone I feel I can relate to but I respect her right to her opinions.
s douglass
3rd March 2008
Anne Atkins may speak out about a lot, but I find her depth of ignorance appalling. She demonstrates dreadful use of statistics. Her comments on Thought For The Day this morning were particularly fatuous - questioning human impact on the planet - see the New York Times, for yesterday, for example - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/26/science/earth/26coas.html

That's why Anne Atkins is infuriating. She has a public platform, but no depth of investigation or consideration. Just glib opinions, based on bigotry.

I do understand the desire of Christians to assert that all beliefs should be respected. When the beliefs are founded on miscomprehension and ignorance, it makes them very difficult to respect. Why should one offer respect to beliefs, when the basis for forming them is misinterpretation of physical evidence?

So, no, I won't be reading Anne's opinion. I don't believe what she has to say. I'm only here because she has so consistently misunderstood and misrepresented on Thought For The Day, with no right to reply.
Jeremy Chatfield
28th February 2008
Have visited this site for the first time after hearing Anne Atkins on BBC Radio 4 'Sunday' - 03/02/08. As a liberal Anglican its hardly suprising that I profoundly disagree with many of Ms Atkins views. However there was an interesting message left 14/07/07 by Susan Wilson suggesting that there was creationist literature that should be read before we dismiss this view and also presumably so called ' intellegent design ' theory. If Ms Wilson reads this message can she please identify this literature. In return I suggest that creationists spend some time reading the summaries of the latest work on DNA sequencing which should finally deal with the endless campaigns against evolutionary theory by rightwing US evangelicals.
Dick Kent
4th February 2008
Just heard Anne speak on the Radio 5 'Drive' programme with regard to sex education in Britain (23rd November). Absolutely wonderful to here such heartfelt and intelligent common sense on bringing up children in the rather scary society in which we live.Despite the interviewer's best efforts, Anne pointed out that sex education cannot be simply "added-on" - it must be incorporated into the whole of the child's educational upbringing with input from teachers and above all parents. It struck me that the interviewer, whilst sneering at this "old fashioned" moral view, would no doubt be tut-tutting his way through the next story of teenage pregnancy and kids running wild that the programme covers! Thanks Anne!
simon evans
23rd November 2007
thank you for today's 'Thought for the Day'. Compelling listening and compassionate
Tom Ambrose
22nd November 2007
As my first name is Timothy I would ask for your response to chapter 2. if you try to quote from "good" bits of the bible there is much worse - would you like to start at slavery? A good book?
pebble green
20th November 2007
quoting the "old testament" is rather problmatic. Is offering your daughter (when some bad people knock at your door) to be raped a "rule" or "smiting" (pretty well anytime) some non jews a good thing. If you say no you are disagreeing with your god!
pebble green
20th November 2007
I saw Anne on the Heaven and Earth last month;, and was sad that she so adamantly slated creationists, without qualification. I wondered if she has read any books on this subject. Many specialist areas have to be studied to assess the experts who feel evolution has had time to prove itself but has not done so yet. Cd she look at some of the literature on this subject before being so dismissive.
Susan I . Wilson
14th July 2007
My wife and myself are really heartened by Anne who stands up for Jesus Christ. In an age where many in society, and some in the church, rail against the LORD Jesus she stands firm. Anne would agree that it is the strength of the LORD that keeps her going. The same is true for us too. Nevertheless having Anne speaking in the public domain is a real help to us as we seek to bring the message of Christ's salvation to a deprived area.
David Jones
9th December 2006
I have always enjoyed hearing what Anne has to say on different subjects. It is so encouraging when people are willing to stand up for what they believe.

Has she heard about the sexual orientation regulations that they are trying to bring out next year? If she is interested there is a very good website by the Christian Congress for Traditional Values (www.thecctv.org).
Jocelyn Smith
29th November 2006

Leave your comments on this item

More website comments

Copyright © 2008 Oxford Diocesan Board of Finance Credits Privacy